Rant of the Week

West Wingers

 Just about the only television show I watch semi-regularly nowadays is "West Wing".  And The Simpsons.  But let's stay with "West Wing" for a minute.

I have to note here though that the only reason I don't watch very much television is not because most television is crap, though it is.  The fact is that there is a lot of good shows on television too.  The trouble is that there are way too many commercials.  Did you know that the Dick Van Dyke Show, in the early 1960's, was about 28 minutes long?  The average sitcom today is about 20 minutes.  Where did the other 8 minutes go?  You need to ask?

In tonight's episode of West Wing, the President had to make some fateful decisions about possible military action to rescue hostages in Columbia.  The story, which parallels reality rather closely, develops after the government gives Columbia $15 billion to fight the drug trade.  After a remarkable speech about the utter futility of the drug war, the waste of money, the 80% of the U.S. prison population that consists of drug users, and so on, the dialogue takes a turn on Viet Nam.  One of the President's top advisors warns that he should not repeat the mistake of Viet Nam, which was... what?   What was the mistake?  The advisor said the mistake was that the U.S. entered the war on the side of a corrupt and unpopular government, and that it did not have clear objectives, and did not have a clear exit strategy.  That was the mistake of the Viet Nam War.

The West Wing is one of the few television shows that really is unabashedly liberal.  Don't believe for one minute all that nonsense from Conservative commentators on the so-called "liberal" media-- it simply aint true.  West Wing is the exception, not the rule.

But the advisor's explanation about why the U.S. lost the war in Viet Nam buys into a conservative revisionist position that is itself a desperate attempt to rehabilitate the idea of U.S. subterfuge of foreign governments for its own self-interest.

The Viet Nam War began because the U.S. and France refused to accept the results of an election in 1956 which produced a socialist government of a united Viet Nam.   With both French and American encouragement, a group of rebels seized power in the South and created a pro-capitalist regime.  When the new regime proved unpopular-- after all, the people elected the socialists-- the U.S. was forced to step in to support the government, and fight a proxy war against the North Viet Namese government, which, reasonably, was determined to reunite the country.

Where did France go?  Those silly Frenchmen!  They decided that backing a self-seeking, corrupt, illegitimate government against the popular wishes of its own people was a losing proposition!  The fools!

The North did not remain democratic, really, but we don't know what would have happened if the South had not seceded and the U.S. had not involved itself.   It doesn't really matter-- the fact is that the U.S. interfered in the domestic policies of a sovereign state and paid the price for it.  That's why they lost Viet Nam.  It had nothing to do with unclear objectives.  The objective was, in fact very clear: the maintenance of a pro-American proxy state in the region at whatever cost to civil rights and democracy.  The problem was not that the Americans did not have an exit strategy: given the objectives, there was no need for an exit at all.  And the problem was not that the government of South Viet Nam was unpopular and corrupt: that was at least partly a consequence  of U.S. policy, not an impediment to it.  Had the U.S. stayed out, chances are quite good that that corrupt government could never have sustained it's position.

The writers and producers of "West Wing" should know better.

But it's a great show.  It's subtle, sophisticated, topical, and relevant.  That's rare in television.  What's even more rare is the overt political nature of the program: it is quite frankly Democrat in perspective.  The Democrats should be proud.

The Republicans, if they were really smart, would be working on their own television drama by now.  On the other hand, they already have a dozen: Law and Order, NYPD Blue, and just about every other cop show on television.  They almost all show that respect for civil rights and the assumption of innocence is an impediment to justice and fairness.  They almost all propagandize for unlimited police powers.   They almost all feed into the right wing paranoia that has led to the creation of America's idiotic drug and gun laws.

All Contents Copyright © Bill Van Dyk
 2001 All Rights Reserved