Rant of the Week

Demographics and Moral Decline

The 20th was a century unlike any other.  I am this moment interested in one particular difference-- the democratization of knowledge-- the massive influx of middle-class and poor students into post-secondary institutions of higher learning that occurred in the 1960's, and our ever-so-sweet, controversial, apocalyptic moral decline.  Here we are.  We've declined.  We have the morality of alley cats.  How did we get here?

For all the white noise and rhetorical flashes over the issue, it's really not all that complicated.  Until the 20th century, only the children of very rich, very privileged people could receive a higher education.  These were children of people who benefited from the status quo.  They were the status quo, either the church or the aristocracy.  And all intellectual conversation took place on their terms, in their language, in a manner congenial to their ultimate self-interests, especially when it concerned noblesse oblige.

And then suddenly you have democracy and a prosperous middle class and suddenly children of hard-working middle-class parents get to go to college, and buy records, and go to movies, and read books, and suddenly Leo Strauss and Allan Bloom are whining about the tragic loss of culture and learning when what they really mean is that their privileged little ivory towers no longer command the landscape, and those suckers, those helplessly inane but physically peerless farmer's boys, were no longer mindlessly willing to go immolate themselves on spears and in trenches in order to preserve Allan Bloom's right to buy $4,000 dinner jackets, smoke Cuban cigars, and troll the streets of Paris looking for rough trade.

The same elitist attitudes certainly exist today. There has been no decline. If anything, there is probably more elitist achievement and behavior today than there ever was before. But the elitists are outnumbered. And they hate it. They just can't stand the fact that Bruce Springsteen sells more copies of his songs about seducing New Jersey girls named Sandy with tight unzipped jeans, than the Chicago symphony will ever sell of any work by Beethoven. More people have seen "Blade Runner" than will ever see "Hamlet". Besides, I'm not all that sure that "Hamlet" really is more important, or more of an indication of sophisticated and developed taste than "Blade Runner" is.

The bottom line is never surprising.  Neo-cons like Bloom and Strauss and their disciples (who don't occupy quite as many positions within the Bush administration as they used to) want to build a world in which their social and political class get to dictate culture to the masses.  For all their bitter complaining about the "nanny state", they are far more authoritarian, and far more willing to over-rule popular taste. 

They are and always have been the real advocates of "political correctness": patriotism, chastity, prurience, and consumerism. 

 

All contents copyright © 2007 Bill Van Dyk All rights reserved.