Rant of the Week

Deter Who?

 

“It is MOD policy not to comment on submarine operational matters, but we can confirm that the U.K.’s deterrent capability has remained unaffected at all times and that there has been no compromise to nuclear safety,” a ministry spokesman said.  NY Times (Feb 15, 2009)

So two subs, one British, one French, collided in the mid-Atlantic, and we are supposed to be relieved that U.K.'s "deterrent capability" remained unaffected.  Which of course makes you wonder, who exactly is an imminent threat to the U.K.?   Who is threatening to launch their nuclear missiles (that is what a "deterrent" is for) at London and Liverpool?   Why is Britain spending so much money to keep these floating doomsday devices out there?

But the most interesting thing is this.  Think about it: these two subs are absolutely loaded with the most sophisticated, powerful technologies available to mankind.  We have spared no expense to provide them with every tool imaginable to ensure that they can reliably murder millions of their people if someone dares to murder millions of our people.  Their crews have been trained by our most experienced, wisest, and ingenious scientists and leaders. 

And they couldn't keep from running into each other on the open seas.

And they are supposed to have "fail-safe" systems in place to keep the bombs from going off by mistake.  But all their resources couldn't keep them from running into each other.

The subs look very solemn.  They are huge and weighty and black.  They are coated with materials to hide them from sonar.  They are powered by nuclear reactors.  They can go under the arctic ice.  The men on them wear uniforms on land and salute each other reverently when passing.  For all the costumes and show, they are like little tin soldiers marching back and forth, back and forth, under the delusion that they keep the sun shining and the stars from falling with their little ministrations.

All Contents Copyright © Bill Van Dyk
 2009 All Rights Reserved
Font: Verdana